#Difference between firefox and waterfox code#

While the difference might be imperceptibly small between all benchmarked browsers, it is still very much LightвЂ™s victory.Data collection and tracking have become a digital epidemic over the past decade, as user information has become the largest commodity in the world. Rather than giving great results tailored to only one system architecture, Light seems capable of delivering to both. While Waterfox might also have done the same thing, the fact Light is available for 32-bit and 64-bit computers is even more exciting, for it suggests that the same results are possible regardless of operating system. By paring back unnecessary features, those responsible for the build have been able to create something faster than MozillaвЂ™s own browser.

The browser is exactly what it strives to be: light. Light must surely be singled out for how well it works.

#Difference between firefox and waterfox code#

With that in mind, it remains an impressive feat that the team behind the Waterfox project managed to outpace the company responsible for developing the core code they are working from. It can be tempting to become overly concerned with the state of benchmarking, but in reality it has very little difference on overall browser performance. However, the difference between the two is so incredibly small (quite literally milliseconds) that in everyday usage the two handle in much the same manner. We found Waterfox to be a very usable browser, and it achieved slightly better scores in benchmarking than MozillaвЂ™s Nightly browser did. Explanation on the official project page is more technical than many users may want, but it should prove enlightening for those with the knowledge to appreciate the developerвЂ™s efforts beyond the softwareвЂ™s functionality. LightДЄnother project found on Sourceforge, LightвЂ™s main goal is to lighten the Firefox web browser in any way it can. While it wonвЂ™t be to everyoneвЂ™s taste, the more conservative approach to browser design can be interpreted as reflective of a desire among some users to abandon the controversial changes Mozilla made. Pale Moon could be described as вЂњtraditional,вЂќ given that it uses the older Strata theme which appeared in Firefox 4 and in a layout more reminiscent of Firefox 2 and 3 builds. Those who use these features will no doubt feel the loss in Pale Moon, though for the average consumer, it may come as a surprise that such a feature even existed. Therefore, Pale Moon does not include such features as Sync, and some technical components are absent. The aim behind the Pale Moon project is to cut back what the developer sees as bloat. Pale Moon is one of the most well-known variants using the familiar Firefox platform. With both downsides already mentioned, it could be tempting to ponder why anyone would use the Nightly browser вЂ“ in truth, there is an element of excitement to being on the cutting edge, whether due to changes the general public will not see for months or due to the potential for new and enticing features. Unlike Chrome, updating is not performed as a background operation, meaning that the browser has to be restarted for each and every update. The Nightly builds of Firefox also have another downside in their daily updates. However, being on the cutting edge does not make it totally perfect, given that there may be bugs and issues that manifest themselves in newer, untested code. NightlyвЂs version number is significantly higher than the mainstream browser release, and it is generally seen as the cutting-edge browser. MozillaвЂ™s own testing version, released to the public on a daily basis as code, is revised and tweaks are made. Thus, the precise figures may differ due to system architecture. In our testing, all browsers were 64-bit versions running on a 64-bit operating system. The question is, which variant should you use? Even Mozilla has proven themselves adept at creating variations on the Firefox browser, with the ESL release amongst others. There are quite a few twists on the familiar Firefox platform, and some have become more easily identified than others, with Pale Moon being a good example.